<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>0xDECAFBAD - Tag: pagination</title>
    <link href="http://decafbad.com/blog/atom.xml" rel="self"/>
    <link href="http://decafbad.com/blog"/>
    <updated>2011-11-16T16:29:50+00:00</updated>
    <id></id>
    <author>
        <name></name>
        <email>l.m.orchard@pobox.com</email>
    </author>
    

    <entry>
        <title>date-based pagination</title>
        <link href="http://decafbad.com/blog/2008/07/17/date-based-pagination"/>
        <updated>2008-07-17T18:16:01+00:00</updated>
        <id>http://decafbad.com/blog/2008/07/17/date-based-pagination</id>
        <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Here's a small idea I've not yet had the chance to try out on a large scale:  Time-based pagination in lieu of page-number-based pagination for personal content - ie. blogs, bookmarks, status updates, etc.  (You know, User Generated Content except I dislike the term.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Page numbers change over time, while time-based URLs are stable.  Most people don't generate an unreasonable amount of stuff in a day, so a page-per-day might not be so bad.  But, if there's too much stuff, degenerate to a page-per-12-hours or whatnot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Delicious used to have something like this in the web UI, back in the mists of 2003 or so, but Joshua got rid of it after a few design iterations.  The Delicious API is still somewhat based on it, which causes some confusion—but I tend to like it, thus this post.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div id=&quot;comments&quot; class=&quot;comments archived-comments&quot;&gt;
            &lt;h3&gt;Archived Comments&lt;/h3&gt;
            
        &lt;ul class=&quot;comments&quot;&gt;
            
        &lt;li class=&quot;comment&quot; id=&quot;comment-221085362&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;meta&quot;&gt;
                &lt;div class=&quot;author&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a class=&quot;avatar image&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; 
                       href=&quot;http://beesbuzz.biz/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://disqus.com/api/users/avatars/plaidfluff.jpg&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
                    &lt;a class=&quot;avatar name&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; 
                       href=&quot;http://beesbuzz.biz/&quot;&gt;fluffy&lt;/a&gt;
                &lt;/div&gt;
                &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-221085362&quot; class=&quot;permalink&quot;&gt;&lt;time datetime=&quot;2008-07-17T20:22:38&quot;&gt;2008-07-17T20:22:38&lt;/time&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;You mean, like the date-based archives that Movable Type has had for ages?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I like those.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            
        &lt;/li&gt;
    
        &lt;li class=&quot;comment&quot; id=&quot;comment-221085363&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;meta&quot;&gt;
                &lt;div class=&quot;author&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a class=&quot;avatar image&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; 
                       href=&quot;http://brevity.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=55d0166df4149bbea204bb997f8447cb&amp;amp;size=32&amp;amp;default=http://mediacdn.disqus.com/1320279820/images/noavatar32.png&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
                    &lt;a class=&quot;avatar name&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; 
                       href=&quot;http://brevity.org/&quot;&gt;Neil Kandalgaonkar&lt;/a&gt;
                &lt;/div&gt;
                &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-221085363&quot; class=&quot;permalink&quot;&gt;&lt;time datetime=&quot;2008-07-18T19:44:42&quot;&gt;2008-07-18T19:44:42&lt;/time&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've had the same idea for Upcoming, for obvious reasons... our SRP pagination would then be permalinks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            
        &lt;/li&gt;
    
        &lt;li class=&quot;comment&quot; id=&quot;comment-221085364&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;meta&quot;&gt;
                &lt;div class=&quot;author&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;a class=&quot;avatar image&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; 
                       href=&quot;http://www.anildash.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://disqus.com/api/users/avatars/anildash.jpg&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
                    &lt;a class=&quot;avatar name&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; 
                       href=&quot;http://www.anildash.com/&quot;&gt;Anil Dash&lt;/a&gt;
                &lt;/div&gt;
                &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-221085364&quot; class=&quot;permalink&quot;&gt;&lt;time datetime=&quot;2008-07-25T17:11:40&quot;&gt;2008-07-25T17:11:40&lt;/time&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
            &lt;/div&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;content&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Actually, yeah, we built the default pagination for archives in MT4 to be category-by-month, for exactly this reason. I regularly see &quot;?page=2&quot; in URLs and it just seems like such an obvious, avoidable mistake for so many to have embraced. SEO aside, permalinks that are destined to expire over time seem pretty reader-hostile, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
            
        &lt;/li&gt;
    
        &lt;/ul&gt;
    
        &lt;/div&gt;



</content>
    </entry>
    
    
</feed>

